Quantcast
Channel: SCN : All Content - SAP for Utilities
Viewing all 3025 articles
Browse latest View live

Cahs desk payment error

$
0
0

Hi Experts,

 

I am facing a peculiar problem.When payment is posted using Cash Journal (FPCJ) the open items does not get cleared if payment is received in cashbefore the due date of open item- it gets posted as an on account payment. On the contrary, when the payment is received thru check before due date then the open item gets cleared.

 

When payment is posted using cash on or after due date of open item then it gets cleared.

 

I have assigned the same clearing variant for payment types in Open Item Management > Clearing Control > Define Specifications for Clearing Types >Define Defaults for Incoming Payments

19 Cash Desk: Payment

20 Cash Desk: Payment by Card

21 Cash Desk: Payment by Check

 

Please advise

 

Thanks & Regards

Satyajeet


RATE not determined in RATE DETERMINATION also getting fetched.

$
0
0

Hello ISU Gurus ,

 

I have an Installation say INS1 with Rate Category XYZ and to this Installation 4 Devices are connected Each with Individual Rate types ( Say ABC1 , ABC2 , ABC3 , ABC4 ).

 

Now Rate Determination is maintained for the above Rate Category + Rate types combinations i.e

 

XYZ + ABC1 = RATE1

XYZ + ABC2 = RATE2

XYZ + ABC3 = RATE3

XYZ + ABC4 = RATE4

 

Now  a Billing Schema is defined say BLLSCHM which contains of the above Rates i.e RATE1 , RATE2 , RATE3 , RATE4 and also RATE5 ,

 

Now for RATE5 No Rate Determination combination is available in this particular Installation , though this installation INS1 refers to Rate Category XYZ and XYZ indeed refers to Billing Schema BLLSCHM which contains RATE5.

 

Now my question is whenever I am doing Billing , the Billing Document generated contains Line Items generated due to RATE5 also , how is this possible ? reason being No Rate Determination is maintained for RATE5.

 

Please help me getting clarified with the same.

 

Thanks ,

Sijin

Bank details IN 234567348 989279473892 in the validity period are not unique.

$
0
0


Hello FI-CA colleagues

 

I need your help in an issue described below......

 

Scenario:-

We are using two system A and B, BP are stored in A and as well as B, Any update in BP ( ex, Bank or address details ) triggerd from A and send by idocs to B, Finally BP update in system B.

 

So the issue is idocs coming from A to B ( inbound ) are failing due to an error Bank details IN 234567348 989279473892 in the validity period are not unique.

 

Could you help me please ?

 

 

Regards

Amit

Fracking! Government wants to get cracking

$
0
0

The contentious question around shale gas keeps creeping up on the agenda and with the South African Government’s promises of decreased unemployment an ever-present energy supply issue and the varying groups of lobbyists constantly on the increase, it seems that neither fracking nor discussions regarding the topic are going to disappear anytime soon. Here we look into some of the challenges and aspects around shale.

 

It is not only the current critical shortage of energy in South Africa (worsened by the delays at the Medupe and Kusile power station construction projects) driving discussion, but also increased energy requirements from industry and urbanisation as well as the need for cheap and efficient energy. Renewables
such as solar and wind - while extremely clean and constantly reducing in cost per watt - still remain expensive as well as rather inefficient in relative terms,
not to mention the fact that this form of energy generation still remains very limited in terms of the number of projects/capacity coming online.

 

It became abundantly clear from President Zuma’s State of the Nation address that energy is a key priority for South Africa and that shale gas is absolutely on the agenda. The country’s current energy shortage, excluding requirements for the next 10 years which we need to take into consideration, is already estimated by some sources to be in the tens of thousands of Gigawatt hours. Suffice it to say that the shortage is immediate and growing and that there is a dire need for solutions which can be delivered in an environmentally friendly manner and gain political consensus. From this perspective, shale gas might look like a good “fix” as it - from a pure production perspective - could be up and running relatively quickly. (The realities surrounding the entire process and logistics etc is discussed later.) 

 

Governments position likely stems from three key factors:

  1. Meeting energy demand which is at critical levels and slowing economic growth
  2. Unemployment: the immediate effects on employment are expected to be significant and would be felt in the upstream, supply chain and importantly also downstream operations.
  3. Attracting capital: this would be expected to ensure continued foreign direct investment (FDI) in sustainable capital projects.    

These are likely the reasons motivating governments’ eagerness to progress with the shale gas project(s).

 

That said, many aspects have to be considered and remain to be discussed before any action is taken:

  • Skills: Fracking brings the demand for specialised skills and there needs to be an active skills transfer program to avoid only using expatriates
    to run and manage these sites and create sustainability.
  • Ownership: Current draft legislation sees government taking a 20% share in any fracking venture with the right to purchase another 30% at “market
    related prices”. This needs consideration because on average in the industry, these multi-million dollar investments in exploration have a 40-75% chance of failure. Doing so reduces the incentive and increases risk significantly for any investor. Both for risk-reward in production as well as the as yet unclear valuation to be used for the purchase of a future 30% share.
  • Capital: significant capital for the investments in exploration and production is likely to come from offshore. Many global majors are probably keen on investing, but aside from the ownership issue above, the question is whether we are able to incentivise them on keeping cash (profits) in-country.
    As this impacts the real impact and contribution to the local economy.
  • Supply chain & downstream transportation/processing: The extraction of gas is really only a small part of the total challenge. If we look at where
    these known deposits sit, the challenge would be how to find and manage many suppliers in remote locations such as the Karoo and more importantly how to plan and handle storage and transportation to where it is needed. This will also require the funding of infrastructure etc. Is there capital and
    consideration as to who will fund this (whether rail or improved roads etc).
  • Land ownership: Given that mineral rights in most cases belong to the government and that, as individuals, we typically have a fear of the unknown and many questions over the possible environmental impact, there is little incentive for people to support such ventures and it is likely that private
    land owners will push back wherever they can.
  • Potential Environmental impact: There are two key environmental concerns, firstly; where does all the water come from (fracking requires significant
    quantities)? Secondly; in some systems it is claimed up to only 50% of the fracking fluid is recovered as the rest remains underground and it is argued that this can leach into soil and ground water. (This is now being mitigated through closed-loop systems, greener chemicals, well construction standards and is highly dependent on the seal rocks and general geological structure and remains highly contentious). Fracking fluids contain a number of chemicals that perform a multitude of functions such as acting as carriers, preventing corrosion, viscosity regulators, stabilisers etc.
    Can this potentially lead to short or even longer-term environmental issues? This question is hard to answer as many factors play a role and again,
    the long –term consequences are as yet not proven. Would, for example, there be funds set aside for possible environmental issues that do occur?

 

Alternatives: Ideally we would use this discussion as a segue to a broader conversation around all types of energy production and the sustainability from an economic, environmental and political aspect. In general, fracturing cost efficiency is high compared to other renewables which has also prompted the high focus. Here we should consider the real opportunity costs and impacts of various forms of generation, including renewables, nuclear and co-generation, as well as their longevity.

 

Unfortunately for now renewables are relatively more expensive but could it nevertheless be the time to make that step-change and invest in improving the technology and using the abundance of, for example, sunlight we are blessed with, given that enough energy can be produced form 10 minutes of sunlight to power the earth for a year? A number of interesting alternatives are already emerging throughout the country including hydroelectric facilities such as the one on Johann Rupert’s L’Ormarins wine farm, the various sugar-cane bagasse that already powers multiple sugar mills in the country and other projects in the first three rounds of the renewable energy program for independent power producers (IPP’s).

 

And finally: It’s not all about creating new forms of energy generation                       

We mustn’t forget that as significant as energy creation is, energy saving through tight measures could lead to savings that are equivalent to a generation project in itself.

Various sources allude to Eskom’s Integrated Demand Side Program having saved over 2,000 MW of energy through their initiatives which is
noteworthy. The continued efforts and technology improvements (such as LED lighting, solar heating etc.) should be a clear part of any strategy.

 

From the above it becomes clear that there are many issues that need to be addressed and this list is by no means exhaustive. The key here is to ensure
all key stakeholders are involved and all possible options and ramifications considered.  It is likely to be a lively debate as government aims to provide the energy as well as jobs it promised whilst pitted against those with environmental concerns as well as rival political parties.

Can Technology Help Keep the Lights on in Africa?

$
0
0

Right now, the energy industry in sub-Saharan Africa is at a crossroads. Faced with booming demand from a growing industrial sector, urbanisation and an impatient consumer base, the region’s energy utilities must deal with a unique set of challenges that can ultimately drive away both local and foreign investment and affect entire economies if they are not overcome.

 

We’re all too familiar with some of these challenges: ageing infrastructure that breaks down at inconvenient times; the need to optimise assets; the problem of meeting the demands of increasing urbanisation and business growth, while dealing with growing environmental considerations. Nobody said it was easy.

 

But by using modern ICT tools smartly, energy utilities could be keeping the lights on more effectively by having insight into critical areas like asset performance, consumption patterns, predictive maintenance, load forecasting and any anomalies.

 

Fact is, Africa’s utility companies can no longer afford to rely on outdated ICT infrastructures. The stakes are simply too high. The energy and natural resources sectors are the backbone of Africa’s economy and are vital to the current and future growth and well-being of many countries. New oil and gas discoveries in Africa are opening new opportunities for growth, and mining continues to be a key revenue generator in many African countries.

 

One of the keys to success for any utility in the world today is effective data management. Utilities need to not only gather large amounts of information, but critically, understand that information and turn it into insights that can be acted upon.

 

By doing this, they can diagnose and even predict issues before they happen, leading to increased asset effectiveness, the prevention and real-time handling of unplanned downtime, better daily forecasting and even the ability to predict demand. And all this can be done from a mobile device whilst sitting at an airport.

 

Having reliable data that is collected effectively can provide huge competitive advantage. It allows energy companies to operate efficiently and see where and when energy discrepancies occur. This ultimately leads to reduced costs once the system is in place.

 

A simple example is meter readings, which can become much easier to collect and to analyse for usable insights into how energy is being used for individual consumers, in specific regions or even to detect fraud. With insights like these, utilities are better equipped to handle their customer needs, respond to those needs and better match supply and demand.

 

Another major challenge facing our utilities right now is that they don’t have the right levels of supply chain visibility. In other words, they lack the ability to know what is happening in all aspects of their organization and thus are not able to predict problems and quickly respond to the changing needs and challenges on the ground.

 

With an adaptive supply chain, utilities can intelligently adapt to changing market conditions and synchronise supply to demand by having distribution, transportation, and logistics processes integrated with their real-time planning processes. The result: energy procurement costs decrease and improved grid operations mean that maintenance costs are reduced.

 

And once utilities are running what they have more efficiently, they are then able to look at more innovative platforms to differentiate themselves and create new revenue streams, interact in new ways with stakeholders, adapt more quickly to the changing business environment and improve productivity, transparency and decision-making.

 

Energy companies in Africa cannot afford to be left behind. They don’t have much time, though, which is why the emergence of cloud-based data and analytics solutions could emerge as the unlikely hero of energy crises across the continent. On the flip side, there really is a bright future for those that invest in the right data management infrastructure. Utilities that are functioning at the top of their game will naturally attract investors and ensure their place at the forefront of the African energy market for decades to come.

Customer centric parameters for billing service fees

$
0
0

Hello Community,

 

Not new on this forum, but this is actually my first post.

 

I'm trying to findout what the best solution is to add all kind of billing related functionalities related to the customer /  contract account.

For example service fees for paying direct debit, service fees for online discount.

Next to service fees we would also like to have other steering parameters in our billing that is not related to a connection, but to a contractaccount or customer.

 

What we normally do is create functionallity per connnection (on installation facts), but this is rather strange for non connection related services. Sometime we need to put a parameter on both connections, due to the fact that customer can switch per product to an other supplier.

 

In the past I have seen solutions where a seperate installation was created for these services, but thats also strange.

 

We are using SAP ECC 6.0 with EHP2 and will upgrade to EHP 7 witin a year. Is there functionality available in our current system how we should solve this?

How do other companies solve this problem, Custom development is not preferred and I am also afraid of performance impact during billing and invoicing run.

 

Hopefully I will get some best practices or solutions that we can also use for our implementation.

 

Thanks in advance

 

W.

EA60 Spool download per Invoice

$
0
0


Hello Team,

 

I am working on EA60(Invoice printing) of ISU. Here If I am running the prinitng based on protion Wise , system will create a single spool request containg all the document .  Now I am writing an enhancement wherein to convert the spool into PDF. It works fine converting the spool to PDF. But as system generate a single spool corresponding to all the invoices so my converted PDF contains multiple pages.

 

If there any way I can make multiple spool corresponding to every invoice by running the report based on proting.

 

The Idea is to download the PDF corresponding to every Invoice.

 

I tries the external mail option in print parameters given in EA60 but it will great n mail corresponding to N invoices within the group & it is very diffcult to download every invoice from mail & make a repository .

 

Also suggest if I use external mail option while running EA60 portion wise can I have mail header linked with Invoice no or Consumer no so that looking at mail I can say that this invoice belongs to this consumer.

 

 

Regards,

Pankaj

SAP EDM - How to display consistency check text error message in the profile import application log

$
0
0

Hi Experts,

 

We are facing an issue during the development and configuration of SAP EDM consistency checks.

 

After doing all the configuration related to consistency checks (consistency check, error code, text message) and generate the related consistency check groups, we are not able to get, during the display of the profile import log errors, the error message related to a consistency check error code.

 

SAP is displaying the generic error code 035 "Error in consistency checks for profile &1", while what we need is the specific message related to the error code, as without it, the user won´t be able to understand which consistency check (and for each consistency check ,which error code) has created the error log.

 

We have reviewed the standard code and see that the consistency check name and the error code are saved, during the consistency check execution, into the internal structure EEDMCONSATTRIBUTES, but this information does not seem to be used later to check EDMCONCHKERRT table and retrieve from there the error code text, to add the text into the log error.

 

Has anyone faced a similar issue?

 

Thanks in advance,

 

Regards

 

Rafael


DFKKCOH - COPRI field empty

$
0
0

Hi,

In my currect client, there are couple of entries which get generated everyday in DFKKCOH table with blank COPRI (Print date). This causes FPCOPARA to fail.

Can anyone please give some thoughts on why the COPRI field is blank?

 

Regards,

Sanjeev

BP relationship replication between CRM to ISU

$
0
0

Hi Colleagues,

 

I tried to replicate BP relationship using the BUPA_REL queue from CRM to ISU, but i can see BP is getting replicated individually to ISU using BUPA_MAIN queue, but the there is no relationship in ISU with the MKK contract partner which is maintained in CRM. I maintained all the setting as per SAP best practices. Now when i checked outbound queue in SMQ1, i can see R3ABUPA* entry is stuck in SYSFAIL. when i checked sysfail error it shows "Function module "CRM_BUPA_INBOUND_REL_MD" not found", but i maintained this FM in the CRMC_BUT_CALL_FU table as per SAP best practise.

 

Could someone help me to sought this out? Am i missing something here, because of this outbound queue throwing this error?

 

Kind regards,

Arnab.

BP replication as a MKK contract partner role from SAP CRM to SAP ISU

$
0
0

Hi Experts,

 

I am trying to replicate BP with sold to party role (CRM000) from CRM to ISU as MKK role, but i am getting BDOC error saying "No customer account group assigned to business partner grouping Z001". I maintained the grouping for BP number range in CRM as Z001 as well as in ECC. Also i maintained the PIDE setting for CRM->R/3 as B 0001 (Sold to party). Although the BP is replicated as Customer using the PIDE setting, but as a MKK role its not getting replicated. I maintained all the standard setting as per the CRM/ISU cookbook. Also if i create the BP as prospect role (BUP002) its getting replicated without any hiccup, but not in the case of Sold to party.

 

Could you please let us know if i am missing something here, any help would be appreciated?

 

KInd regards,

Arnab.

Value for Register based Operand not showing in X_OP Import Parameter of Variant Program's Function Module

$
0
0

Hello ISU Gurus ,

 

I have a Variant Program which has 6 Input Operands of which 4 are Register based operand and 2 are Fact based operands.

Now am debugging the FM corresponding to this Variant.

As always X_OP is the Input Parameter for passing the  Input Operand data to this FM.

So , while debugging X_OP-I1 ,X_OP-I2 ,X_OP-I3 ,X_OP-I4 ,X_OP-I5 and X_OP-I6 are containing the Input Operands name.

and correspondingly X_OP-T1 ,X_OP-T2 ,X_OP-T3 ,X_OP-T4 ,X_OP-T5 ,X_OP-T6 contains the Data for these Input Operands,


So as per above details X_OP-T5 and X_OP-T6 are for Fact Operands , in debugg mode when I look into them they are having the corresponding FACT  values ,


Capture1.PNG


But the Value containing Internal Tables for Register based operands i.e T1 , T2 , T3 , T4 are not having values in


Capture1.PNG   

Though am able to get their values i.e Meter Readings from other Parameter  XY_OBJ which is a Changing Parameter of this FM ,

But my question is why its not getting populated in these tables ?

I hope I was able to convey my question.

 

The Big picture is below ,

Capture.PNG

Upload Meter Readings Difference between FM's

$
0
0

HI Gurus,

 

I want to know about the difference between FUCNTION modules BAPI MTRREADDOC UPLOAD and ISU_S_METERREAD_CHANGE...


currently for us the functionality is that if a periodic meter reading/meter reading order exists on the same day as the incoming interim meter reading(09), then the FM ISU_S_METERREAD_CHANGE is used to upload the meter readings or else if no periodic meter reading /meter reading order is found then the fm BAPI MTRREADDOC UPLOAD is used for storing the meter readings. I want to know why these separate FM's are used, is there any difference in the way they store the meter readings?


Need a bit of urgent help..:)

 

Thanks a lot!,

Suman

contract creation

$
0
0

hi all

 

  ES20 allows us to create a new contract other  than  creating  a contract through movei,in the last  tab  of installation in that particular  tcodes screen  ,i  dnt  find the filed for entering the installtion  for which i need to  assign this contract,i  suddenly  found it  disapper,i  am sure that  i ssigend a contract account  and a installation for creating ancontract in  ES20.

 

let me know how to  make this installation field appear again...

 

 

kr

 

raj

Message no. >A121 sap No processor object found for key

$
0
0

Hello,

 

We are using dunning by collection strategy, with BRF rules.  One of the dunning steps(activities) is the creation of a work item list. When running Dunning Proposal we do not face any issue, but when running Dunning Activity for the customers that are at this step we face the above error.

 

In net most solution regarding this problem are related to organizational structure but i don't think this is my case. Just to try I gave to the user which executes dunning "SAP_ALL" profile and than no error is given. Than I removed SAP_ALL and traced authorization (st01) but it looks like there is no authorization error.

 

Any idea?


Cahs desk payment error

$
0
0

Hi Experts,

 

I am facing a peculiar problem.When payment is posted using Cash Journal (FPCJ) the open items does not get cleared if payment is received in cashbefore the due date of open item- it gets posted as an on account payment. On the contrary, when the payment is received thru check before due date then the open item gets cleared.

 

When payment is posted using cash on or after due date of open item then it gets cleared.

 

I have assigned the same clearing variant for payment types in Open Item Management > Clearing Control > Define Specifications for Clearing Types >Define Defaults for Incoming Payments

19 Cash Desk: Payment

20 Cash Desk: Payment by Card

21 Cash Desk: Payment by Check

 

Please advise

 

Thanks & Regards

Satyajeet

Contact Energy New Zealand Discuss Business Benefits achieved with help from MaxAttention

$
0
0

Contact Energy is a vertically integrated generator and retailer of electricity and gas in New Zealand. They serve about, 500,000 customers every day, 24/7. Their customers’ expectations are changing quite rapidly. The world of the homogenized mass market has gone and customers are seeking individualized service. What they needed at the core of their business was technology that would enable them to industrialize and remain low cost, but also enable them to add modules and extra capabilities to meet customer expectations.

 

Mark Corbitt, General Manager ICT, Contact Energy New Zealand stated, “The major components we deployed were CRM, ECC modules, including the industry services for utilities, which was a major part of it, stream serve, and open text…we initially started with MaxAttention from a project perspective. We needed access to expertise. There were two, what I would term ‘top-line’ SAP experts that spent really a few days with us. So after just a few days we were honing and focusing on a couple of issues, we saw 30 percent improvement in our CRM performance.”

“The real benefit to that is not that the system performs faster but the outcome for our business is that what we call average handle time, the amount of time a customer takes on a call with us, dropped by 100 seconds. Now that’s substantial because it means you can take more calls, it means you can answer a customer’s query much more quickly, which obviously they’re happy about, and the cost to serve overall decreases as well. And that’s a fantastic example around the benefits of Max Attention,” Mark added.

James Kilty, General Manager Sales and Customer Experience, mentioned, “It was critical to me to get assurance around the subject matter that I’m not that comfortable with, ICT, and that we were adopting best practice processes and systems in our implementation. So that advice and support from our parent company, coupled with the utilization of MaxAttention has made the whole process a heck of a lot easier for us.” He continued, “We went live with our system 6 months ago. At that point we set out a forward path for the stabilization of the business and then a real push into starting to drive the benefits of the business.

 

With the work we did, prior to go live on testing our performance work and the reviews and support we had from MaxAttention, the stabilization process for us here at Contact Energy has gone very well.” Mark added, “What you can do from the business side of things offsets multiple times the additional cost from a technology perspective. Looking at MaxAttention as a part of that, it’s ‘how’ we compress the speed at which we get those business outcomes by making sure the technology operates as ‘effectively’ as possible. That’s probably the key for introducing MaxAttention into the SAP landscape and as part of the implementation.”

 

Mark continued, “All of the transactions have been sub-3 seconds, which from a performance perspective immediately after go live is for us pretty spectacular. The actual batch processing itself has fallen within the window 90 per cent of the time early on and right now it’s 100 per cent of the time.

The key point for me around both MaxAttention and Active Embedded – is that you don’t need to know the right questions to ask. You get two weeks of attention and you see a 30 per cent improvement in your transactional performance results and a reduction in handle time. That’s fantastic.” James stated, “The system implementation is a challenging thing in and of itself, and it’s really important that you get first class advice to do that really well because the last thing you need when you’re trying to transform your business and drive a culture change is to have a system that isn’t working. And MaxAttention is a critical part of making sure you get that right.”

 

Bank details IN 234567348 989279473892 in the validity period are not unique.

$
0
0


Hello FI-CA colleagues

 

I need your help in an issue described below......

 

Scenario:-

We are using two system A and B, BP are stored in A and as well as B, Any update in BP ( ex, Bank or address details ) triggerd from A and send by idocs to B, Finally BP update in system B.

 

So the issue is idocs coming from A to B ( inbound ) are failing due to an error Bank details IN 234567348 989279473892 in the validity period are not unique.

 

Could you help me please ?

 

 

Regards

Amit

How to check read status whether "active" or "inactive"?

$
0
0

How to check if a 09 or a 01 read is active or inactive?

 

Is this actually maintained somewhere? I am not able to find this actually.

Spool output by Smartform (XSF) has to be transferred to Application server

$
0
0

Hi Experts,

 

I have a requirement where a FORM (XSF) output into SPOOL and at the same time, the spool data has to be trasnsferred into APPLICATION SERVER. I could find the solution in SDN in the following thread.

 

Meter reading order download

 

I did same as explained in the thread for the Output device settings but the spool is not transferred to Application server. How to check where the problem is?  Please help

 

Thanks in Advance,

Chintu.

Viewing all 3025 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>